Muhammed Taha v. The Travancore Cochin Council Of Modern Medicine
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/8TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17244 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- MUHAMMED TAHA, S/O. SHEEBA NK & TM KALAM, NAMBIPUNNILATH HOUSE, PERINGANAM EAST, THRISSUR, (NOW RESIDING AT SELMA MANZIL, MARADU PO, ERNAKULAM 682 025).
BY ADVS.SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.MANU GOVIND RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE TRAVANCORE COCHIN COUNCIL OF MODERN MEDICINE, TRAVANCORE-COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCILS, COMBINED COUNCIL BUILDING, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 035.
2. THE REGISTRAR, TRAVANCORE COCHIN COUNCIL OF MODERN MEDICINE, TRAVANCORE-COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCILS, COMBINED COUNCIL BUILDING, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 035.
3. THE LAKESHORE HOSPITAL, NH-47 BYPASS, MARADU , NETTOOR PO, KOCHI-682 040 REPRESENTED BY PADMASREE DR.PHILIP AUGUSTINE- MANAGING DIRECTOR & CEO.
4. DR.THOMAS VARGHESE, RENAI MEDICITY, MAMANGALAM, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 682 025.
R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
WP(C).No. 17244 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 A COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16/12/2014 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P2 COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 7/1/15 FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT THROUGH THE2ND RESPONDENT, TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT , WITH COPY TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 4/3/15 FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXT.P4 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 27/4/2015 FROM PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.
/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 17244 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner had sought for a treatment summary of the treatment conducted by the 4th respondent in the hospital of the 3rd respondent. The petitioner is said to have received the summary. Leaving open all contentions of the petitioner, the writ petition would stand closed.
Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy/ P.A to Judge