High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17281/2015disposed of

K.Laila Muhammed Kutty v. The Sub Collector

2015-10-30Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/8TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17281 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- K.LAILA MUHAMMEDKUTTY, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O.MUHAMMEDKUTTY, KANJIRAL HOUSE, AREAKODE P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 639.

BY ADVS.SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE SUB COLLECTOR, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 639

2. THE TAHASILDAR, ERANADU TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 639.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AREAKODE VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 639.

4. PATHUMMA, W/O.MARAKKAR, THEVEISSERRY HOUSE, AREAKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 639.

5. MUHAMMEDALI, S/O.MARAKKAR, THEVEISSERRY HOUSE, AREAKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 639.

R1-R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ROSHAN D. ALEXANDER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 17281 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 14.08.2013. P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT BEARING NO. H2.19519/13 DATED 24.04.2014. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29.09.2014. P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.10.2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 17281 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached 1st respondent-The Sub Collector alleging blocking of public water channel by party respondents. The Sub-Collector passed Ext.P4 Order and directed the Village Officer to take steps after hearing the parties concerned.

2. This Court is of the view that appropriate decision shall be taken on the request of the petitioner by Sub-Collector after hearing all concerned and if obstruction still subsists, the same shall be removed without any delay. Needless to say that this exercise is to be carried out, if the decision as per Ext.P4, has not been stayed or interdicted by any competent court or other higher authorities. Needful shall be done within a period of six weeks.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr