High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20423/2011disposed of

Nair Service Society v. The State Of Kerala And Others

2015-06-03Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas,Honourable Mr.Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/13TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20423 of 2011 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

---------- NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI.G.SUKUMARAN NAIR, PERUNNAI CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM-686102.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP SRI.MATHEWS RAJU RESPONDENTS:

------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, (DEVASWAM) SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

3. THE GURUVAYOOR DEVASWAM MANAGING COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR GURUVAYOOR DEVASWAM, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR-680101.

4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A.), GURUVAYOOR DEVASWAM, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR-680101. *ADDLR5.K.G.SUKUMARAN MASTER S/o.GOVINDAN,KRISHNALAYAM MAYOOR APARTMENT, THEKKENADA GURUVAYOOR-680 101 (ADDL.R IS IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DTD 6/9/11 IN I.A.NO.13233/11) R3 BY ADV. SRI.U.K.RAMAKRISHNAN (SR.) ADDL R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN R, BY ADV. SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR R, BY ADV. SRI.K.JAGADEESH R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON R3 BY ADV. SMT.P.VIJAYAMMA R1, 32 & R4 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER : ADV.SRI.A RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.

============================== W.P(C).No.20423 of 2011 ============================== Dated this the 03rd day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with subsequent events, the subject matter of this writ petition does not survive for consideration and that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS Judge Sbna