K.Jayaraman v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17862 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------------------ K.JAYARAMAN STORE ASSISTANT KERALA STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MUSEUM VIKAS BHAVAN PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695033 BY ADVS.SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2. DIRECTOR KERALA STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MUSEUM VIKAS BHAVAN, PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695033 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 17862 of 2015 (G) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE GO (MS) NO.03/2012/S &T DATED 16.04.2012 EXTP2:

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE 31ST GOVERNING BODY MEETING HELD ON 24.04.2014 EXTP3:

TRUE COPY OF THE GO(MS) NO.114/2014/H.EDN. DATED 05.03.2014 EXTP4:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E/958/12/KSSTM DATED 20.06.2014 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXTP5:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E/1470/08 DATED 11.12.2014 OF THE 2ND RESPPONDENT EXTP6:

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE AMENDMENT OF SERVICE AND CONDUCT RULES OF KERALA STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MUSEUM EXTP7:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.41855/K2/14/H.EDN. DATED 12.03.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXTP8:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E/958/12/KSSTM DATED 24.03.2015 OF THE 2NND RESPONDENT EXTP9:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.41855/K2/14/H.EDN. DATED 24.04.2015 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.17862 of 2015 - G ====================== Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is on the verge of retirement and seeks that the proposal made by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent for enhancement of retirement age from 58 to 60, may be directed to be expedited.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that though the proposal was made, as per a communication dated 26.09.2015, the 1st respondent has declined the proposal.

The writ petition hence would stand closed.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.