High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17865/2015disposed of

Muhammed Navas v. Local Level Monitoring Committee

2015-08-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17865 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- MUHAMMED NAVAS, AGED 23 YEARS S/O.ABDULGAFOOR, PERUMPILLY HOUSE, KARUVAMBRAM AMSOM MELAKAM DESOM, MANGALASSERY, KARUVAMBRAM PO MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA SRI.SAJU RAGHAVAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE (DATA BANK), MAMBAD VILLAGE REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, MAMBAD VILLAGE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 121

2. MAMBAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MAMBAD PO MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676121 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJ P. KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 17865 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MAMBAD DATED 23.04.2014 EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LIE AND NATURE OF THE PROPERTY EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20.08.2014 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.17865 of 2015 - G ====================== Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks correction of data bank with respect to a property having an extent of 63 cents comprised in Sy.No.209/1 in Block 83 of Mambad Village, Nilambur Taluk covered by registered document No.4557/2013 of Nilambur SRO.

2. The learned Special Government Pleader (Revenue) submits on instructions that already the property is described as land converted 10 years back in the data bank. In such circumstance, the petitioner would have to approach the appropriate authority under the Kerala Land Utilization Order 1967 as has been declared in Puthan Purakkal Joseph v. Sub Collector [2015(3) KLT 182] The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.