← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17877/2015disposed of

A.Jalaludeen v. The Regional Transport Authority, Kollam

2015-06-19Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17877 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- A.JALALUDEEN, S/O.ABUBAKKAR KUNJU, THEKKECHARUVILA VEEDU, KULAPPADAM NEDUMPARA P.O., KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOLLAM-691 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM- 691 001.

R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 17877 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT. P1TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE NO.KL 02 AD/8467.

EXT. P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL ALONG WITH CHALLAN DATED 21.3.2015.

EXT. P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 21.3.2015 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ----------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 17877 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Aggrieved by the delay in considering the application for renewal of permit, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

2.

The petitioner, who is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL 02 AD/8467, has been issued with a regular permit on the route between Roaduvila and Kollam Andamukku, which was valid till 09.02.2015. He submitted an application for renewal on 21.03.2015 belatedly along with an application for condonation of delay in submitting the renewal application. The petitioner alleges that the delay in submitting the application was due to medical reasons. The petitioner is aggrieved by the non consideration of the renewal application. Hence, this writ petition. 3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

W.P.(C) No. 17877 of 2015 ..2..

and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. As the limited prayer in this writ petition is only for a consideration of Ext.P2 application, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 application submitted by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this writ petition and a copy of this judgment before the respondent at the earliest. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-