← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17888/2015disposed of

K.M. Mohandas v. Trichur Corporation

2015-06-16Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17888 of 2015 (I) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- K.M. MOHANDAS MANAGING DIRECTOR, WEST FORT, HOSPITAL GROUP TRICHUR.

BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. TRICHUR CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRICHUR -680 001.

2. ASSISTANT SECRETARY (ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT), TRICHUR CORPORATION TRICHUR - 680 001.

3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT), TRICHUR CORPORATION TRICHUR - 680 001.

R1 BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION SRI.V.N.HARIDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 17888 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28.8.2010 EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 2.9.2010 EXT.P-3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 2.9.2010 SEEKING ENHANCED CONNECTED LOAD.

EXT.P-4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION ALONG WITH THE COVERING LETTER DATED 15.10.2012 EXT.P-5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.3.2015 EXT.P-6: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 5.5.2015 EXT.P-7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.5.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 17888 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

There is no justification to impose penalty keeping the application for enhancement of connected load pending. This is the case urged by the petitioner in Ext. P7 representation submitted to the second respondent.

2.

I direct the second respondent to consider Ext. P7 representation filed following Ext. P2 representation. The same shall be done with notice to the petitioner within a period one month. The coercive steps as against the petitioner shall be put on hold till orders are passed on Ext. P7 representation as directed above.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE