Jilcy Jose v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17954 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
--------------------- JILCY JOSE D/O. LATE P.V. JOSEPH KANDATHIL HOUSE EAST VAZHAPILLY P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 673 ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.B.HARINARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S) :
---------------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVEDRNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 691 001.
2.
CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY DECEASE OF KOTHAMANGALAM, BISHOP'S HOUSE KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 691 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
3.
THE REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANCHI UNIVERSITY ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686 562.
R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE R3 BY ADV. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn ...2/-
WP(C).No. 17954 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 12/8/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 1/1/2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT LETTER DATED 19/12/2014. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 31/3/2005 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P5 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12/5/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
............................................................. W.P.(C).No.17954 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, who is the daughter of an employee who died in service while working as a Lab Assistant (Senior Grade) at Newman College, Thodupuzha, has preferred Ext.P5 representation before the 1st respondent seeking appointment under the compassionate appointment scheme. It is her case in the writ petition that, she was initially granted the benefit of an appointment under the scheme, but the order of appointment was subsequently cancelled. It is under these circumstances, that Ext.P5 representation has now been filed before the 1st respondent seeking a reinstatement of the petitioner in service. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation after hearing the petitioner.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing counsel for the 3rd respondent University.
3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct the 1st
W.P.(C).No.17954 of 2015 respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with the copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns