← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18024/2015disposed of

M/S. Reliance Jio Intocomm Limited v. District Telecom Committee

2015-06-23Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18024 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- M/S. RELIANCE JIO INTOCOMM LIMITED, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS INFOTEL BROADBANK SERVICES LTD., HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFICE AT CHANDRIKA TOWERS, S.A. ROAD, VYTILLA, KOCHI-19, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR.VINOD GIYAL.

BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. DISTRICT TELECOM COMMITTEE, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY IS CHAIRMAN, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR-680 001.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 18024 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT DATED 15.11.2007. EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.6.2011.

EXHIBIT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE UNIFIED LICENSE DATED 21.10.2013 WITHOUT ITS ANNEXURES.

EXHIBIT P4:

TRUE COPIES OF THE BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPALITIES.

EXHIBIT P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 15.3.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 2.8.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P8:

TRUE COPIES OF THE APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P9:

TRUE COPIES OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RECEIVED FOR THE APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P10: TRUE COPIES OF THE REMINDERS SENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P11: TRUE COPIES THE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RECEIVED FOR THE REMINDERS SENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT 12:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.3.2015 IN WPC NO.9345/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.18024 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by the undue delay in consideration of Ext.P8 applications submitted to the 1st respondent and seeks expeditious disposal of the same.

The learned Government Pleader on instruction submits that the petitioner's representation was placed before the first respondent in the meeting held on 16.06.2015. The petitioner's representatives were also present in the meeting. However, the general public had created a ruckus and no consideration could be made on that date. It is also submitted that the matter is posted on 01.07.2015. The District Telecom Committee would desirably dispose of the same expeditiously.

Recording the above submission, writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge