High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18051/2015disposed of

Pradeep Kumar v. The Secretary

2015-06-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18051 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------- NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------------------------------------------------- PRADEEP KUMAR, THANNIKKAL KIZHAKKETHIL, AYIKUNNAM, SASTHAMCOTTA.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------------------------------------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM- 691 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 18051 of 2015 (F) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT. EXT.P2:

THE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08.05.2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.13497 OF 2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------------ NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18051 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's application for temporary permit in the light of Ext.P2.

The petitioner is the owner of a stage carriage bearing registration No.KL 7/AE 8584. The petitioner applied for temporary permit between Mantro Island and Padanayarkulangara in the vacancy of stage carriage bearing NO.Kl 2/Q 799. The petitioner alleges that the original bus is not operating and thus there is temporary need warranting issuance of temporary permit. The petitioner submitted Ext.P1 application. But the same has not been considered so far. It is in this background, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter.

W.P.(C) No.18051 of 2015 -2Considering the nature of submissions and the nature of relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 application in the light of Ext.P2, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. To facilitate an early action, it shall be open to the petitioner to produce a copy of the writ petition as well as the copy of this judgment before the respondent at the earliest. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.