← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25431/2007dismissed

Thomas George Muthoot, Muthoot (H) v. The Asst. Labour Officer

2015-07-21Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2015/30TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 25431 of 2007 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------- THOMAS GEORGE MUTHOOT, MUTHOOT HOUSE, KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.STEPHEN RESPONDENTS :

---------------

1. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER - GR-II, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, FIRST CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE.

2. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND THE COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE.

ADDL.R3 TO R7 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.26.8.2009 IN I.A.No.10694/09. ADDL.R3 PADMA SUCHITRA.M.S., 1/4272 "PADMASREE", P.O.ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE - 673 006.

ADDL.R4 PRINCE JACOB THOMAS, H.NO.OP/319-A, GURUVAYOORAPPAN COLLEGE ROAD, KOZHIKODE - 673 014.

ADDL.R5 V.JASIND, No.29/1093, PUNATHIL PARAMBA HOUSE, KOTTOOLI.P.O., KOZHIKODE - 16.

ADDLR6 GEETHA VENUGOPAL 'ASWATHY' 26/1759-B, P.O.KOMMERI, KOZHIKODE-7.

ADDL.R7 C.A.VENGIDESHAN, SREEPADAM, JANATHA ROAD, KARUVASSERY, KARAPARAMBU.P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 010.

BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.25431 of 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Registry has noticed that notice to respondents 3 and 6 returned unserved stating 'not known'. Notice issued to respondent No.5 is also not returned after service.

2.

On 10.7.2015 when this matter came up for consideration in the defect list, there was no representation for the petitioner. By order dated 10.7.2015 the petitioner was directed to take steps to cure the defect within ten days and it was also ordered to post the Writ Petition on 21.7.2015, if no steps are taken to cure the defect. 3.

The Registry has reported that the petitioner has not taken any steps to cure the defect. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner when the case was taken up for consideration in the defect list.

In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, JUDGE skj True copy P.A to Judge