← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18291/2015disposed of

K.S.Muhammed v. The Secretary

2015-06-23Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18291 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- K.S.MUHAMMED KOTTAKUZHIKKAL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMPURAM P.O., MANNUR PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT :

------------------------ THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, PIN- 678 001.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 18291 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION PARTICULARS IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE KL-09/N 919.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 16/6/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18291 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Seeking for a direction to the respondent to issue clearance certificate by keeping the regular permit under suspended animation, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

2.

The petitioner is a regular stage carriage permit holder on the route between Guruvayur and Palakkad in respect of stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL 09/N 919. The petitioner alleges that as he is intending to replace the above vehicle by a later model vehicle, he submitted Ext.P2 application before the respondent so that he can dispose the vehicle and obtain a suitable vehicle for the operation on the aforesaid route, keeping the permit under suspended animation. However, the respondent has not considered Ext.P2 till date. Hence, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

W.P.(C) No. 18291 of 2015 ..2..

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the prayer, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 application submitted by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-