Cheenikkan Hameed v. District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/28TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No.18296 of 2015 (J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- CHEENIKKAN HAMEED,AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.CHEENIKKAN BEERAN,K.P.8/297,INDIANNOOR P.O. KOTTAKKAL,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676503.

BY ADV.SRI.P.K.MOHAMED JAMEEL RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM-676505.

2.

THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORISED COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN (THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER), MALAPPURAM DIST-676505.

3.

LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS CONVENOR CUM AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KOTTAKKAL,KOTTAKKAL P.O.,MALAPPURAM DIST-676503. BY SENIOR GOVT PLEADERSRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.18296 of 2015 (J) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1-THE TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED SETTLEMENT DEED BEARING NO.438/2012 OF S.R.O. KOTTAKKAL.

EXHIBIT P2-THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF THE LAND SITUATED IN 218/12 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTAKKAL.

EXHIBIT P3-THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23-05-2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.18296 of 2015 -J ====================== Dated this the 18th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 application under Rule 5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (for brevity, Act of 2008) to reclaim the land for the construction of a residential house. The application is seen filed on 23.05.2015. The 3rd respondent/the Local Level Monitoring Committee definitely will have to look at the applications pending before it and dispose of the same in accordance with law and forward their recommendation after due inspection if found necessary to the 2nd respondent within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. The 2nd respondent also shall take a decision in the matter in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.