Sasco Exports v. The Union Of India And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2015/10TH ASHADHA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.22230 of 2010 (C) --------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- SASCO EXPORTS, 129-NO.8, IST FLOOR, GAUTAM NAGAR NEW DELHI-110 049.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER(EDAPPALLY) SRI.CIBI K.CHERIAN.
RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
2. THE JOINT SECRETARY (GULF AND HAJ), MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY (HAJJ) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
4. HAJ COMMITTEE OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY IT'S CHAIRMAN, HAJ HOUSE, 7-A, M.R.A.MARG, PALTON ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 001. R1 TO 4 BY ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA SRI.N.NAGARESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
WP(C).No.22230 of 2010 (C) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.7.2009 IN W.P.(C).NO.21095/2009.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PRESS RELEASE MADE BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION WHICH HAD BEEN DOWNLOADED FROM WEBSITE OF THE INDIAN CONSULATE IN SAUDI ARABIA.
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 10.6.2010 IN W.P.(C) NO.17946/10.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------------- NIL vku/- [ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.22230 of 2010-C ------------------------------------- Dated this the 01st day of July, 2015
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition was filed seeking a direction to register the petitioner as a private tour operator for Hajj, 2010. As of now nothing survives in the writ petition. The contentions of the petitioner are left open. The writ petition would stand closed. No costs.
Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/- [ true copy ]