Muraleedharan v. Taluk Surveyor

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No.18383 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- MURALEEDHARAN,S/O.BHASKARAN, THOZHELI HOUSE,CHELAMATTAM KARA, CHELAMATTOM VILLAGE,OKKAL.P.O, PERUMBAVOOR,PIN-683550.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL RESPONDENT'S:

------------------------- 1.

TALUK SURVEYOR,KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR-683542.

2.

STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.18383 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1:COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.C2-18179/2014 DATED NIL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.18383 of 2015 ====================== Dated this the 19th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the notice issued as Ext.P1, which is a notice for conducting survey under the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961, but, however without any description of the property in the said notice. In such circumstance, no proceedings can be taken as per Ext.P1. However, the authority would be entitled to issue a fresh notice with the details shown therein, to the petitioner. Leaving open all contentions of either parties, the writ petition would stand disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.