Saly Tomy v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2015/12TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18434 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SALY TOMY, MANJAPPILLIL HOUSE, PULIYANNUR VILLAGE, PULIYANNUR P.O., PALA.

BY ADV. SRI.S.VIDYASAGAR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, MEENACHIL TALUK - 686 589.

3. THE THALASIDHAR, OFFICE OF THE THALASIDHAR, MEENACHIL TALUK - 686 589.

4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULIYANNUR VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK - 686 589. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 18434 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.1469/2015 OF MEENACHIL SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE HAVING AN EXTENT 22.05 ARES IN THE SURVEY NO.509/7/1 OF PULIYANNUR VILLAGE.

P2:

THE TURE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 1-6-2015.

P3:

THE TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 7/3/2015, FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT, FOR EFFECTING MUTATION IN THE MUTATION REGISTER. P4:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE VILLAGE TAX RECEIPT SHOWING THAT THE THANDAPER NUMBER 4767 IN THE NAME OF PETITIONERS MOTHER IN LAW. P5:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONERS MOTHER IN LAW ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, MUTHOLLI GRAMA PANCHAYAT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 18434 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 03rd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 application filed before the 2nd respondent. The application is seen filed only on 07.03.2015. The authority definitely will have to look at the similar applications pending before it and dispose of the same in accordance with law however, taking up for disposal those applications filed earlier in point of time first. Ext.P3 would be considered expeditiously. Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge