High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18440/2015disposed of

The Manager, Lal Bahdur Sasthri Memorial High School v. The State Of Kerala

2015-06-19Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18440 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):--- -------------------------- THE MANAGER, LAL BAHDUR SASTHRI MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL AVITTATHUR - 680 683, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014 3.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE - 680 003 4.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 121 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 18440 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2014-2015 DATED 15.07.2014 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.B2/14311/2014 K.DIS, DATED 31.03.2015 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.05.2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------ NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 18440 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 19th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

Challenging the staff fixation order for the year 2014-2015, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 revision petition before the 2nd respondent. The limited prayer sought for in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision, within a specified time frame. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition preferred by the petitioner, at the earliest, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent, for further action.

sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das