High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18688/2015disposed of

Suharabi v. The District Police Chief

2015-08-03Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015/12TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18688 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SUHARABI, AGED 42 YEARS W/O ABDURAHIMAN, PADATHUPEEDIKA HOUSE, VAZHAYOOR EAST VAZHAKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF MALAPPURAM, PIN:676505.

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN:673638.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VAZHAKKAD POLICE STATION MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN:673640.

R1-R3 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. P. VIJAYARAGHAVAN BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. V.H.JASMINE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 18688 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R AND F.I.S. IN CRIME NO.299/2015 OF THE VAZHAKKAD POLICE STATION DATED 4.4.2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS -------------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE SD

P. UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18688 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner herein is the defacto complainant in crime No.299/2015 of the Vazhakkad Police Station, registered under Sections 354,354(A)(ii)(D1),448,506(i) and 509 IPC. She has brought this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing effective investigation in the crime. Now, there is report from the police that investigation is over, and that final report is submitted in court under Sections 354,354(A)(ii)(D1),448,506(i) and 509 IPC. In view of the report submitted by the police, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this proceeding can be closed. It appears that the writ petitioner is not aggrieved when there is final report against the accused. From the report filed by the 3rd respondent, I find that proper investigation was conducted by the police. In such a situation, this writ petition can be closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate relief as regards final report.

In the result, this petition is disposed of, without prejudice

W.P.(C)18688/2015 to the right of the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as regards final report submitted by the police. Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE sd