K. Thankan v. Kerala State Road Transport
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18692 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------- K. THANKAN, AGED 48 YEARS EMPANELLED DRIVER, KSRTC, VIKAS BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENT(S):
------------------
1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN:695023.
2. ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER KSRTC, VIKAS BHAVAN DEPOT, VIKAS BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695033.
R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 18692 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF DUTY PASS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER, DATED NIL. EXHIBIT P1A: TRUE COPY OF CASH RECEIPT DATED 3.4.2000. EXHIBIT P1B: TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM DATED 10.4.2000 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P1C: TRUE COPY OF ATTENDANCE DETAILS FURNISHED BY THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFICER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY DEPOT TO THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER VIKAS BHAVAN ON 27.5.2004. EXHIBIT P1D: ATTENDANCE DETAILS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16.5.2015 COLLECTED THE PETITIONER UNDER INFORMATION ACT FROM THE VIKAS BHAVAN DEPOT.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF GOVT. ORDER DATED 22.12.2011. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT REPORT IN 2013(2) KLT 258. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.2.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.18692 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The issue is covered by Ext.P3 judgment in Suresh Kumar v. State of Kerala [2013 (2) KLT 458]. The services of the petitioner are therefore liable to be regularised in the wake of Ext.P2 Government Order and Ext.P1 (c) and Ext.P1(d) attendance details. The first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P4 representation and regularise the services of the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.