The Ottapalam Co-Operative Marketing Society v. The Commissioner Of Civil Supplies
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/9TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18694 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- THE OTTAPALAM CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED NO.P 526, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI. P.SAMPREETH, RESIDING AT PANDARATHODIYIL HOUSE, AMBALAVATTOM P.O., PANAMANNA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679 501.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SRI. DINESH C.
SRI. RENJITH G.
SMT.JINNU SARA GEORGE SMT.ASHA BABU RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695 001.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD-678 001.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 18694 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.CS 4-4367/2014 DATED 29.5.2015 ISSUED BY R2.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF REVISION PETITION NO.A8-13896/2015 DATED 5.6.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R1.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 5.6.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R1.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 18694 of 2015 (J) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with Ext.P1 order which is pending in revision before the Commissioner of Civil Supplies, Thiruvananthapuram.
2.
The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the order has been stayed and hence, the petitioner will continue the ration shop till orders are passed in the revision.
In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition. The writ petition would stand closed. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj