K.V.Mohanan v. The Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23002 of 2009 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------- K.V.MOHANAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O.VIJAYAN, KUZHIYANVELIL, OKKAL KARA, CHELAMATTAM VILLAGE, KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.S.VIDYASAGAR SMT.MINI RAJ RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. MUDAKKUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUDAKKUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUDAKKUZHA (PO) VIA VENGOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. THE PRESIDENT, MUDAKKUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUDAKKUZHA P.O.
R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.N.ANIL KUMAR R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.K.RAFEEK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 23002 of 2009 (U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1: TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED DTD.23.10.03 P2: TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLOSIVE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY P3: TRUE COPY OF QUARRYING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE KERALA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD VALID UPTO 10.2.2010 P4: TRUE COPY OF THE QUARRYING PERMIT UNDER KMMC RULES P5: TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DT.14.11.06 OF DMO,ERNAKULAM IMPOSING CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF D&O LICENCE BY R2 PANCHAYAT WITH REPORT OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANT. P6: TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT ORDER DT.5.12.06 ISSUED BY R2 ALLOWING COMPLIANCE OF EXT.P5 CONDITIONS FOR ISSUING D&O P7: TRUE COPY OF NOC DT.19.1.07 ISSUED BY DMO ON COMPLIANCE OF CONDITIONS IN P5 PROCEEDING P8: TRUE COPY OF REMINDER LETTER DT.18.2.09 FOR ISSUANCE OF D&O LICENCE BY PANCHAYAT P9: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION UNDER PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT TO ISSUE A COPY OF NOTIFICATION U/S 232(1) OF KPR ACT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL OKB True copy P.A. to Judge
K.HARILAL, J.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ W.P.(C) No.23002 of 2009 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dated this the 16th day of December, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is conducting a quarry in the landed property belonging to him located in ReSy.No.504/4 of Vengoor West Village. According to him, he has obtained all permits required under law from the competent authorities which are necessary for conducting a quarry. Exts.P2 to P5 are the statutory licences/permits issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO), Kerala State Pollution Control Board, Geologist, District Officer of the Mining and Geology, District Medical Officer, etc. On receipt of the application for D&O licence the 2nd respondent Panchayat issued Ext.P6 letter requiring the petitioner to comply with the conditions specified by the District Medical Officer by Ext.P5 consent. On receipt of Ext.P6 letter from the Panchayat, the
WP(C).23002/09 :2: petitioner complied with the stipulations in Ext.P5 order and obtained Ext.P7 No Objection Certificate from DMO for granting D&O licence from the Panchayat. The grievance of the petitioner is that from 2007 onwards, though the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent for issuance of D&O licence, the Panchayat evaded from issuing the same without assigning any reason. There is no justification or reasoning for not granting of D&O licence by the 2nd respondent Panchayat. Thus, the petitioner is aggrieved by wilful inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent Panchayat in considering the application for D&O licence.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition and Exts.P1 to P7 documents produced and marked along with the writ petition, it is seen that the petitioner has obtained statutory consent/permit from the competent authorities under various statutes. Further, Ext.P7 shows that he has satisfactorily complied with the conditions stipulated in Ext.P5 consent granted by the District Medical Officer. In view of the statutory permission/licences acquired by
WP(C).23002/09 :3: the petitioner from various Authorities, it was incumbent upon the 2nd respondent Panchayat to consider and pass orders on the application filed by the petitioner. The inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent Panchayat cannot be justified in view of Exts.P1 to P7 documents.
3. Having regard to the above view of the matter, the Secretary of the 2nd respondent Panchayat is directed to consider the application filed by the petitioner seeking D&O licence and pass orders accordingly, at the earliest, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner also.
This writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. HARILAL, JUDGE okb.