Ramachandran v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No.18820 of 2015 (B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER'S:

---------------------- 1.

RAMACHANDRAN,S/O.CHELLAPPAN,AGED 48 YEARS, KATTANATTUKUZHIYIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM P.O.,NIRANAM,PIN:689 621.

2.

C.C.THOMAS,CHARAKATTOR P.O., KUTTOOR P.O.,THIRUVALLA BY ADVS.SRI.P.HARIDAS SRI.P.C.SHIJIN RESPONDENT'S:

------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695001.

2.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PATHANAMTHITTA,PIN-689645. 3.

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,THIRUVALLA,PIN-689101. 4.

AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,KRISHI BHAVAN, NIRANAM P.O.,PIN-689621.

5.

K.G.GEE VARGHESE,KATTUNILATHU PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, NIRANAM CENTRAL P.O.,THIRUVALLA,REPRESENTEDBY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER THOMAS VARGHESE, KATTUNILATHU PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE,NIRANAM CENTRAL P.O, THIRUVALLA,PIN-689621.

R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.18820 of 2015 (B) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1:TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX REGISTER.

EXT.P2:TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND SKETCH OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NIRANAM.

EXT.P3:THE ORDER INTERDICTING THE RECLAMATION DATED 29.1.2015. EXT.P4:THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PRODUCED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT AS EXHIBIT P4 IN W.P(C) 13645/2015.

EXT.P5:TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)13645/2015 DATED 8.5.2005. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 18820 of 2015 (B) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are aggrieved with the appeal filed at Ext.P4, in which they have not been made parties. The petitioners had moved a complaint before the 2nd and 3rd respondents, which resulted in Ext.P3 order being passed. The 5th respondent, who was affected by Ext.P3, filed an appeal, as is indicated in Ext.P4, and also approached this Court seeking expeditious consideration of the appeal, which was directed by Ext.P5.

2.

In such circumstance, if orders have not yet been passed, the petitioners shall be heard before orders are passed. The petitioners shall appear before the 1st respondent on 30.06.2015 and the 1st respondent shall indicate the stage at which the appeal is.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj