C.P.Pocker v. The Director Of Higher Secondary Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 18864 OF 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- C.P.POCKER, MANAGER, C.P.POCKER HAJI MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL OZHUR, VELLACHAL.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANISON SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001

2. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION CIVIL STATION, B2 BLOCK, MALAPPURAM-676 502 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 18864 OF 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.H/1113/2014/RDD/HSE/MLPM DATED 10.02.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 04.03.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.H/3576/2014/RDD/HSE/MLPM DATED 10.02.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 26.02.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.18864 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who was the Manager of an aided Higher Secondary School, appointed two teachers as HSST Juniors in English and Maths with effect from 18.03.2013 and 13.09.2013 respectively. In connection with the grant of approval to the said appointments, the petitioner had preferred Exts.P2 and P4 appeals in respect of both the teachers before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the appeals expeditiously

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P4 appeals preferred by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns