High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18934/2015disposed of

Reghunath Menon v. The Secretary, Cochin Devaswam Board

2015-06-24Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18934 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------------ REGHUNATH MENON, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.V.K.S MENON, THAZHEKKAD DESOM, KALLETTUMKARA VILLAGE, CHALAKKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.SALISH ARAVINDAKSHAN SRI.N.JAGATH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, COCHIN DEVASWAM BOARD, THRISSUR -680 001

2. SPECIAL COMMISSIONER, COCHIN DEVASWAM BOARD, THRISSUR- 680 001

3. JUNIOR DEVASWAM OFFICER, POTHANI SUBGROUP, KALLETTUM KARA- 680 006

4. A.T.SANTOSH KUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. A THANKAPPAN NAIR, ALEKKAT HOUSE, THAZHEKKAD, KALLETTUM KARA, THRISSUR -680 006 R1 TO R3 BY SRI.KRISHNA MENON, SC, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL, SC, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 18934 of 2015 (N) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY EXT.P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 01-03-2015 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 02-03-2015 EXT.P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10-03-15 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.18934 of 2015 (N) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The limited prayer in this petition is to direct respondents 1 to 3 to consider Ext.P4 representation. 2.

The learned counsel appearing for the Board submits that Ext.P4 representation would be considered. The learned counsel for the respondents would also specifically point out that the temple premises has been desecrated and that is the reason for the proceedings taken against the petitioner. In any event, since a representation has been filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously.

Writ Petition disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj