Ratheesh v. The Circle Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18940 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- RATHEESH.V., AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.VISWAMBHARAN, JAYA MANDIRAM, KUTAVETTOR P.O.,POOYAPPALLY, KOLLAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EZHUKONE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM - 691 505.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOYAPALLY POLICE STATION, POOYAPPALLY -691 537.

3. SURESH, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.SADASIVAN RADHAVILASOM KADAKKODU, EZHUKONE -691 505.

4. HAREESH, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SADASIVAN, RADHAVILASOM KADAKKODU, EZHUKONE-691 505.

5. SHIVAKUMAR, SIVA KUMARA VILASAM, VAKKANAD P.O., KOTTARAKKARA - 691 509.

R1 & R2 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 18940 of 2015 (N) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.6.2015 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXT.P-2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P1 REPRESENTATION EXT.P-3:

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P1 PETITION ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXT.P-4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P2 RECEIPT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE sts

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P (C) No. 18940 of 2015 =============== Dated this, the 24th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Attorney.

2.

This writ petition has been filed seeking police protection. Petitioner's case is that he has been threatened by the private respondents with regard to which Ext.P1 complaint has already been filed on 11th June, 2015. A perusal of the complaint indicates that the respondents called the petitioner on phone and it is alleged that they have threatened him. We do not see any reason to issue any direction as on date. We only observe that in any event any offence or attempt to offence is committed, it shall be open for the petitioner to file appropriate complaint.

Writ petition is closed.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp