High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18943/2015disposed of

Daisy Joseph @ Rosamma v. The State Of Kerala

2015-08-07Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/16TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18943 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- DAISY JOSEPH @ ROSAMMA, W/O.LATE JOSEPH, KARUVELITHARA (H), MITHRAKKARI P.O, RAMANKARI VILLAGE, KUTTANADU, ALAPPUZHA.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) SRI.C.H.ABDUL RASAC RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM -695 005.

2. THE DISTRICT POLICE COMPLAINT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA, REP. BY CHAIRMAN - 688 001.

3. THE STATE POLICE COMPLAINT AUTHORITY, TC XV/402, TAGORE NAGAR, LANE 2, VAZHUTHAKKADU, TRIVANDRUM - 14, REP. BY CHAIRMAN.

4. BOBBY KURUVILLA KARUVELITHARA (H), MITHRAKKARY P.O., KUTTANADU, ALAPPUZHA - 689 595.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ.P.KUNJACHAN R4 BY ADVS. SRI.TITUS MANI SRI.BINNY THOMAS SRI.P.A.JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 18943 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

--------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 05.06.2014 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P-2:

TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 05.06.2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.18943 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of August, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P1 application. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the 2nd respondent was not functioning earlier and now the same is constituted and the applications are being taken up in accordance with the date of filing.

In such circumstances, considering the fact that the present application is filed one year back, the matter shall be dealt with expeditiously.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp