High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18944/2015disposed of

Rohit K.R. v. University Of Calicut

2015-06-24Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18944 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- ROHIT K.R., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, KANDAMKURUSSIKATTIL HOUSE, ATTOOR P.O., WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM (DISTRICT), PIN-673 635.

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 635. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, S.C THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 18944 of 2015 (P) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : COPY OF THE MARK LIST ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION IS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P4 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 05-05-2015 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18944 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has come up before this Court for a direction against the respondent university to revalue the answer sheets of the petitioner without any delay. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent University. 3.

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent university, on instructions, submitted that the revaluation would be over within a period of 45 days from the last date of receipt of the application by the concerned centre. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent university to complete the revaluation process within the aforesaid time and to publish the results immediately thereafter.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-