← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18988/2015dismissed

Madhusoodhanan Pillai v. The District Police Chief

2015-06-29Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/8TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18988 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------- MADHUSOODHANAN PILLAI, AGED 53 YEARS S/O. GOVINDAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT AISWARA VILASAM THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM - 691 016.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM) SRI.ANIL ELGIN SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) SRI.S.VINCENT SRI.S.JOSE RESPONDENT(S) :- -------------------

1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF ALLAPUZHA - 688 001.

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA - 690 502.

3. MR.VIJAYAN PANNIKASSERY VEEDU, NEAR CHERIYA PATHIYOOR TEMPLE KAYAMKULAM - 690 502.

R1 & R2 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 18988 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- ----------------------------- EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 23.6.15 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL -------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

---------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18988 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Attorney.

2.

This writ petition has been filed alleging police harassment. Learned State Attorney on instructions would submit that the petitioner was contacted in connection with a complaint filed by the 3rd respondent. Thereafter, the petitioner rushed to the court and filed this writ petition. It is submitted that a crime has already been registered against the petitioner as Crime No.914 of 2015.

3.

From the facts brought on record and as stated by the learned State Attorney, we do not find that it is a case of police harassment.

The writ petition is devoid of merit and it is hence, dismissed.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt