High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19005/2015disposed of

Sudha.C v. The Assistant Eucational Officer

2015-06-24Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 19005 OF 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------- SUDHA.C AGED 32 YEARS W/O.MURALEEDHARAN, U.P.S.A, M.M.M.S.B SCHOOL, KODVAYOOR ERALAMPULLY HOUSE, VELAYODI P.O.ANDIYURKUNNUCHITTUR, PALAKKAD BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE ASSISTANT EUCATIONAL OFFICER, KODUVAYOOR, PALAKKAD-678 501 2.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PALAKKAD-678 501 3.THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 4.THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 5.THE MANAGER,M.M.M.S.B SCHOOL, KODVAYOOR -678501 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 19005 OF 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 13.06.2008 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF STAFF FIXATION PROCEEDINGS DATED 19.11.2008 OF THE RESPONDENT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF DECLARATION EXECUTED BY 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 8.2.2011 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 11.10.2011 EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE AEO FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P6:A TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 21.03.2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC 29019/12 EXT.P7:TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 26.05.2014 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P8:TRUE COPY OF REVISION PETITION UNDER RULE 92 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 2.6.2014 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.19005 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

Seeking approval to her appointment as UPSA in the School, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 revision petition before the 4th respondent, against Ext.P7 order of the 1st respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 revision within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment , after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the 4th respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns