High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29177/2006dismissed

The Managing Director, Ksrtc v. E.Raveendran Chettiar & ANR.

2015-03-25Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/4TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29177 of 2006 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

-------------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY LAW OFFICER SRI.RENJITH JOSEPH.

BY ADV.SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C.

RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. SRI.E.RAVEENDRAN CHETTIAR, RETIRED CONDUCTOR, K.S.R.T.C., PEROORKADA DEPOT. RESIDING AT LEKSHMI NIVAS, MELETHUMELE PEROORKADA VILLAGE, MANIKANTESWARAM P.O.

MANIKANTESWARAM TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. KERALA LOK AYUKTHA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

R BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29177 of 2006 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.2342/2006 DATED 11.9.2006 EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO.LR8/02333/97 DATED 23.4.2004 EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 22.8.2006 OF KERALA LOK AYUKTA IN COMPLAINT NO.140 OF 2006 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.29177 of 2006 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

This writ petition is filed in the year 2006. This case is posted before me in defect list for the reason that, service of notice has not been completed on the 1st respondent, so far. I notice that, though the matter was posted before the Registrar Judicial on 24.06.2011, there was no representation. It is for the said reason that, the matter was posted before the Court on 20.07.2011. When the matter was taken up by the Court also, there was no representation. In spite of the above, ten days time was granted. It is in the above circumstances that, the matter comes up before me. There is no representation today also.

It is obvious that, the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.