High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19189/2015disposed of

Manager v. State Of Kerala

2015-06-26Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937201 WP(C).NO. 19189 OF 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------

1. MANAGER, VANIMEL M.U.P SCHOOL VANIMEL, KALLACHI P.O KOZHIKODE 673506 BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

-------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695303

2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE-673513

3. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NATHAPURAM, KOZHIKODE-673504

4. SAFEERA.P., UPSA, VANIMEL M.U.P SCHOOL VANIMEL,-673504 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 19189 OF 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 30.11.2013 EXT.P2:A TRUE COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DATED 15.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A.NO.812/2015 DATED 09.04.2015 EXT.P4: A COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.C.NO.708/15 DATED 9.1.2015 EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 9.12.2014 IS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.19189 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the Manager of the Vanimel M.U.P School, appointed the 4th respondent as UPSA with effect from 30.11.2013 in a promotion vacancy. When the matter was sent for approval, the Educational authority denied approval to the said appointment. Against Ext.P2 order of the 3rd respondent, the petitioner preferred Ext.P5 appeal before the 2nd respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal expeditiously after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal preferred by the petitioner, within a period of one

W.P.(C).No.19189 of 2015 month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns