Varun.C.S. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937201 WP(C).NO. 19215 OF 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------- VARUN.C.S., HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (JR.) COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, PUTHEN MALIYAKKAL SAYED ALI MEMORIAL AIDED HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL CHEMMANKADAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S):
----------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2.REGIONAL DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION REGIONAL OFFICE MALAPPURAM-676 505
3. REGIONAL DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION REGIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKODE-673001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).NO. 19215 OF 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 28.11.2011 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2012 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02.05.2013 APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER WITH EFFECT FROM 04.06.2012 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER OF THE SCHOOL FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2010-2011 DATED 27.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 20.05.2015 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
............................................................. W.P.(C).No.19215 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who was appointed to a newly sanctioned post of H.S.S.T (Jr.), in Computer Application with effect from 28.11.2011, is aggrieved by the approval granted to his appointment only with effect from a later date. Agitating his grievance, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P5 appeal before the 1st respondent. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal after hearing the petitioner.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 appeal preferred by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns