High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19305/2015disposed of

Ebrahimkutty v. Executive Engineer

2015-09-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19305 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- EBRAHIMKUTTY, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O. ALIYARU KUNJU, 347(17/503), SUDHI COTTAGE, PUTHUCHIRA, THAZHUTHALA VILLAGE, UMAYANALLUR I.E KOLLAM, KERALA - 691 589.

BY ADVS.SRI.ABDUL JALEEL.A SMT.M.A.SULFIA RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD SECTION, PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM- 691 001.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM - 691 588. * ADDL.R3 & R4 IMPLEADED

3. RATHEESH, S/O.THAJENDRAN, RATHEESH BHAVAN, PUTHUCHIRA, THAZHUTHALA VILLAGE, UMAYANELLOOR P.O., KOLLAM-691589.

4. SABU, S/O.BABU, THODIYIL VEEDU, PUTHUCHIRA, THAZHUTHALA VILLAGE, UMAYANELLOOR P.O., KOLLAM-691589. ADDL.R3 & R4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 16/9/2015 IN IA.10689/2015 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 19305 of 2015 (K) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT OF THE LAND OWNED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22/05/2015 FILED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

---------------------------------------- W.P(C)No. 19305 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner submits that additional respondents 3 and 4 have encroached upon the PWD road and the official respondents (respondents 1 and 2) removed the encroachment.

2. This Court is of the view that if the petitioner has any complaint, Ext.P2 shall be considered by the first respondent. If it is found that the party respondents have encroached upon the PWD road, necessary action shall be taken to remove the encroachment on the land in accordance with Land Conservancy Act and Rules. Needful shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge MBS/