Samuel v. Mariamma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No.19333 of 2015 (N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- SAMUEL,AGED 99 YEARS,S/O.UMMAN, KANDAMATHU HOUSE,ARAMPUNNA, PUNALUR VILLAGE,PUNALUR TALUK,KOLLAM.
BY ADV.SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL RESPONDENTS:
------------------------ 1.
MARIAMMA,AGED 49 YEARS,W/O.RAJAN MATHAI, RAJAN VILLA,PANAMPATTA,PIDAVOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK,KOLLAM-691001.
2.
TRIBUNAL FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS,KOLLAM, ( SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE COURT), KOLLAM-691001.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
WP(C).No.19333 of 2015 (N) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1-TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.
EXHIBIT P2-TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.1629/2009. EXHIBIT P3-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL AT KOLLAM DATED 13-3-2015.
EXHIBIT P4-TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO RECONSIDER EXT. P3 ORDER IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISION CONTAINED IN SECTION 23 OF THE ACT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 19333 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P1 application filed before the 2nd respondent. The application is seen filed only on 29.12.2014. The authority definitely will have to look at the similar applications pending before it and dispose of the same in accordance with law however, taking up for disposal those applications filed earlier in point of time first. No warrant for issuance of mandamus exists as of now.Ext.P1 would be considered as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// The words "Ext.P1" wherever it appears in paragraph 4 of the judgment dated 26/06/2015 in W.P(C) No.19333/2015 are corrected as "Ext.P4" as per order dated 16/07/2015 in I.A 9878/2015 in W.P(C) No.19333/2015. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial)