Raveendran Pillai v. District Collector, Alappuzha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/8TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19447 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- RAVEENDRAN PILLAI, BIJU BHAVAN, KONATHALIL, UMAYATTUKARA, KALLISSERY P.O, CHENGANNUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN SMT.PARVATHY NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA-688 001.

2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHENGANNUR-689 121.

3. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, THIRUVANVANDOOR-689 109.

4. P.N.JAYAKRISHNAN, PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, UMAYATTUKARA, KALLISERRY P.O, CHENGANNUR-689 121.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 19447 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1 :

A TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 7-01-2013 IN OS.200/10 IN THE FILES OF COURT OF MUNSIFF, CHENGANNUR.

P2 :

A TRUE COPY OF DECREE DATED 7-1-2013 IN OS.200/10 IN THE FILES OF COURT OF MUNSIFF, CHENGANNUR.

P3 :

A TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

P4 :

A TRUE COPY OF REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 22-7-2013 PREPARED BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR.

P5 :

A TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 15-7-2014 MADE UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.

P6 :

A TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 14-8-2014 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 19447 of 2015 (E) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks consideration of Ext.P3, which is a request to proceed under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, 1957, to remove the encroachment of the public pathway by the 4th respondent. In the nature of the orders to be passed, this Court is of the opinion that no notice need be issued to the 4th respondent. 2.

Considering the confined prayer, Ext.P3 shall be disposed of by the 1st respondent after hearing the writ petitioner as also the 4th respondent and if necessary, after conducting a physical inspection through the 3rd respondent, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj