Satheeshan v. The Deputy Tahasildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/8TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19471 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- SATHEESHAN S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, KANJIYIL VEEDU, THOTTATHUM MURI, KUNNATHOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHAN LAL RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR REVENUE RECOVERY, KUNNATHOOR P.O., SASTHAMCOTTAH KOLLAM, PIN - 690520.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER KUNNATHOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR P.O., SASTHAMCOTTAH KOLLAM, PIN - 690520.

3. SMT.BINDHU KARIKKATHIL VEEDU, KARIMTHOTTUVA P.O.

SASTHAMCOTTAH VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM, PIN- 690520.

R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 19471 of 2015 (H) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXHIBIE-P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE AD-INTERIM ORDER DATED 06/3/2013 IN C.M.P.NO.334/2013 IN M.C.NO.20/2013 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, SASTHAMCOTTAH.

EXHIBIT-P2:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.B6-3216/2015 DATED 15/05/2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ---------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.19471 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 29th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached this Court challenging Revenue Recovery proceedings.

2.

The Revenue Recovery proceedings are initiated to recover the amount ordered by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Sasthamcotta in C.M.P.No.334/2013 in M.C.No.20/2013. It appears that the above petition has been filed under Section 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner seeks to pay the amount in 15 instalments. I am of the view, it is for the Magistrate to consider such request. If the petitioner makes proper application before the Magistrate, necessarily, the Magistrate shall consider the application after issuing notice to the petitioner in that application. To work out the above relief, the coercive steps against the petitioner shall be deferred for a period of one month.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln