Nabeesa Umma v. Canara Bank And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/29TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 29741 of 2006 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- NABEESA UMMA, W/O.SULAIMAN RAWTHAR, KARAKKATTIL HOUSE, KARIMBA, EDAKKURUSSI MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. CANARA BANK, ETTUMANNOR BRANCH, REP. BY ITS MANAGER.

2. ABDUL RAZAK, S/O.NOOR MUHAMMED, DOOR NO.402, K.K.APARTMENTS, KANJIKUZHI KOTTAYAM.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.B.HARI NARAYANAN R1 BY ADV. SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BKA/-

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29741 of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2013

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner stood as guarantor by giving security of her property for a loan taken by her son-in-law for business purpose. As the principal borrower committed financial indiscipline, the respondent bank proceeded against the petitioner. The limited prayer in this writ petition was for a permission to repay the amount in instalments as she was ready for the same.

2.

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent bank submitted that the transaction has been closed.

Since the matter has become infructuous, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE bka/- //True copy// PA to Judge