High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19750/2015disposed of

E.Thamban v. The District Collector, Kasaragod

2015-11-24Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19750 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- E.THAMBAN, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.K.V.NARAYANA MARAR, RESIDING AT 'RAVATHI', VAILHADY, P.O.UPPILIKAI, VAZHUNNORADI, PUTHUKAI VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 314. BY ADVS.SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN SRI. GANESH P.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD, KASARAGOD-1.

2. THE 'MARAR SAMAJAM'

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, HAVING OFFICE AT UPPILIKAI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 314.

3. EDACHERY VEETTIL GANGADHARA MARAR, S/O.KRISHNA MARAR, RESIDING AT SHIVA GANGA, UPPILIKAI, P.O.UPPILIKAI, PUTHUKAI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O.UPPILIKAI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 314.

4. E.MOHAN BABU, S/O.GOVINDA MARAR, 'VAZHUNNORADI', PUTHUKAI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O.UPPILIKAI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 314.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUNJACHAN R2 TO R4 BY ADVS. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH SRI.K.SANTHOSH KUMAR (KALIYANAM) SRI.ADARSH KUMAR SRI.DILEEP CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.19750/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 3/6/2015.

P2 COPY OF THE MASS PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE RESIDENTS IN THE LOCALITY.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J --------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 19750 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the District Collector, Kasaragod by Ext.P1 representation alleging unauthorised burial ground being operated by respondents 2 to 4.

2. According to the petitioner, this burial ground is situated in front of the petitioner's house. In view of Ext.P1, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to take appropriate decision on Ext.P1 after hearing the petitioner as well as respondents 2 to 4 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr