← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19806/2015disposed of

Haseena M.A. v. Commercial Tax Officer

2015-07-01Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2015/10TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19806 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- HASEENA M.A., MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.F.COM DRESSES, BENDICHAL SHOPPING ARCADE, NEAR LIC OFFICE, KASARAGOD.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.K.SREEJITH SRI.V.V.PADMANABHAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

-------------------------------------------------

1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KASARAGOD - 671 121.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEAL), KOZHIKODE - 673 032.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, VIKAS BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM - 695 033.

4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 19806 of 2015 (A) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/01/1415 DATED 29.11.2014. EXHIBIT P2.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/02/1415 DATED 29.11.2014. EXHIBIT P3.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/03/1415 DATED 29.11.2014. EXHIBIT P4.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/04/1415 DATED 29.11.2014. EXHIBIT P5.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/05/1415 DATED 29.11.2014. EXHIBIT P6.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/06/1415 DATED 29.11.2014. EXHIBIT P7.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/14-15 DATED 20.05.2015.

EXHIBIT P8.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32130523012/14-15 DATED 03.06.2015.

EXHIBIT P9.

TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P10. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P2.

EXHIBIT P11. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P3.

EXHIBIT P12. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P4.

EXHIBIT P13. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P5.

EXHIBIT P14. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P6.

EXHIBIT P15. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P7 EXHIBIT P16. THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.06.2015 AS AGAINST EXT.P8.

--2--

--2-- EXHIBIT P17.

THE TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED IN ONE OF THE APPEAL.

EXHIBIT P18. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P19. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P2. EXHIBIT P20. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P3. EXHIBIT P21. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P4. EXHIBIT P22. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P5. EXHIBIT P23. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P6. EXHIBIT P24. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P7. EXHIBIT P25. THE TRUE COPY OF STAY APPLICATION AS AGAINST EXT.P8. EXHIBIT P26. THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF AXIS BANK. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.19806 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 1st day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, challenging Exts.P1 to P8 assessment orders, filed Exts.P9 to P16 appeals before the second respondent. Along with the appeals, the petitioner also filed Exts.P18 to P25 stay applications. It appears that there are delay in the matter. If the petitioner files applications for condonation of delay, that applications shall be considered by the second respondent within one month. If the applications for condonation of delay are allowed, the stay applications shall also be considered. To work out the above reliefs, the revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner shall be deferred.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln