High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19837/2015disposed of

T.K. Johnson v. The Commissioner Of Civil Supplies

2015-10-05Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19837 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- T.K. JOHNSON A.R.D. NO 336, MANNAMPETTA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI SRI.T.P.RAJENDRAN NAIR RESPONDENTS :

---------------------------

1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES COMMISSIONERATE OF CIVIL SUPPLIES PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING , NEAR MUSEUM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 001.

3. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 001.

4. TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, MUKUNDAPURAM, IRINJALAKKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN - 680 121.

5. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 001.

R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MANOJ P. KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 19837 of 2015 (D) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT. P1:- TRUE EXTRACT OF INSPECTION REPORT DTD. 27.6.2015. EXT. P2:- TRUE COPY OF WEIGHMENT SHEET OF ARD NO. 336.

EXT. P3:- TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO B1-1777/15(2) DTD. 29/6/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.19837 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 5th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, aggrieved by an order of suspension of ARD No.336 by the Taluk Supply Officer, has approached this Court. 2.

The learned Government Pleader points out that it is an appealable order. The appeal is to be filed before the District Supply Officer.

In that view of the matter, if the petitioner files the appeal before the District Supply Officer within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, that shall be considered within a further period of two months after hearing the petitioner. Till a decision is taken by the District Supply Officer, the interim order passed by this Court will continue.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln