High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19845/2015disposed of

Benny S Thomas v. Divisional Manager

2015-07-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19845 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- BENNY S THOMAS, KADATHUKULAM HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, KOCHI-683 106 BY ADV. SRI.BENOY K.KADAVAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER (SOUTHERN RAILWAY), DIVISIONAL OFFICE, WORKS BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14.

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD NH DIVISION, KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR-680 664 R1 BY SRI.C.S.DIAS,SC, RAILWAYS R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.19845/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER DATED 14/05/2012.

P2 COPY OF THE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY ISSUED BY MR. AND MRS. VARGHESE THOMAS IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER.

P3 COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ISSUED BY DEPT OF INDUSTRIES DATED 09/12/2014.

P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16/04/2015 P5 COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD P6 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16/04/2015 P7 COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.19845 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 02nd day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Since, the petitioner confines the relief to disposal of Exts.P4 and P6 representations, for issuance of No Objection Certificates, pending before respondents 1 and 2 respectively, it is only proper that the concerned respondents consider the representations, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, expeditiously at any rate within one month from the date of production of the certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not found anything on the merits of the claim.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp