← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19855/2015disposed of

V.P.Alias v. The Cochin International Airport Ltd

2015-07-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2015/18TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19855 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-----------------------

1. V.P.ALIAS, S/O.LATE PAULO, AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT VADAKKAN HOUSE, MEKKAD P.O, MEKKAD.

2. ELDHO ALIAS,S/O.V.P.ALIAS, RESIDING AT VADAKKAN HOUSE, MEKKAD P.O., MEKKAD.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SANJITH SMT.C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOCHI - 683 111.

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., KOCHI AIRPORT P.O., ERNAKULAM-683 111.

3. LAILAMMA PAULSON, W/O.PAULSON, RESIDING AT 'PAINADATH', CHERIYAVAPPILASSERY, KARAMEYKKAD P.O. - 683 589. BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 19855 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE LAND ACQUISITION CERTIFICATE BEARING NO.LAC 271/95 DATED 17.06.1999.

P2 - THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17.02.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 19855 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners grievance seem to be that Ext.P2 application filed on 17.02.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the application in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as also the 3rd respondent.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj