← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19931/2015disposed of

V.L.Lal v. The Secretary

2015-07-02Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19931 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- V.L.LAL, AGED 37 YEARS S/O.LOHIDAKSHAN, KANNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, AZAD ROAD, KALOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM- 682 030.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

WP(C).No. 19931 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 23.6.15. EXHIBIT P1.

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2.5.14 IN WPC 9695 OF 2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19931 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application in the light of Ext.P2 judgment.

2.

The petitioner alleges that a stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL-10/Y 7847, which had been issued with a regular permit valid for five years to conduct service on the route between Pukkattupady and Eramalloor, defaulted operation. As the route has fallen vacant and no other stage carriage is conducting service in the vacant timings, the petitioner filed Ext.P1 application for temporary permit for a period of four months to conduct service on the said route, which is pending. Hence, the petitioner approached this Court for a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application in the light of Ext.P2 judgment.

W.P.(C) No. 19931 of 2015 ..2..

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

Considering the nature of the relief sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 in the light of Ext.P2 judgment, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition along with a copy of Ext.P2 judgment before the respondent at the earliest. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-