← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19948/2015disposed of

Sreejith N.K. v. The Secretary, Regional Transporty Authority, Kannur

2015-07-02Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2015/11TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19948 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------------ NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------------------------------------------------- SREEJITH N.K., S/O.POKKAN, M.P HOUSE, P.O EACHUR, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.MUHAMMED.K.N, S/O.MAYAN, HAFSAS P.O, VENGAD, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------------------------------------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR- 670 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 19948 of 2015 (P) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19948 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The limited prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1, which was submitted by the petitioner for revision of own timings.

2.

The petitioner, who is operating on the route between Vengad and Kannur in respect of stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL-13 Q/1515, alleges that on account of the introduction of increased number of services on the sector, the time gap available to the petitioner has been reduced and he is not in a position to conduct his service profitably. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P1 application for revision of timings, which, according to him, would enable him to conduct his service profitably. As no action has been taken by the respondent on Ext.P1, the petitioner has approached this Court.

W.P.(C) No. 19948 of 2015 ..2..

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the prayer, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-