High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20053/2015disposed of

D.Sasidharan v. The Secretary Regional Transport Authority

2015-10-13Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20053 of 2015 (F) PETITIONER:

-------------------------- D.SASIDHARAN MURALIBHAVANAM, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM, MAVELIKKARA BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (TR) SRI.T.P.SAJAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ALAPPUZHA, PIN 688 001

2. K.SREEDHARAN SREEJESH BHAVAN, ELAPPIKKULAM PO, KATTANAM MAVELIKKARA, PIN 690 101 R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN R2 BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-102015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20053 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE SCHEDULE OF THE PETITIONER'S VEHICLE KL 04 Q 6800 ON THE ROUTE KAYAMKULAM- CHENGANNOOR P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE OF VEHICLE NO. KL 31 A 8686 ON THE ROUTE KOCHIEEDEJETTY-CHENGANNOR P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE OF S/C KL05 Q 6174 ON THE ROUTE KAYAMKULAM -MAVELIKKARA P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26.03.2015 FILED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT 06.04.2015 P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN MVARP NO.83/2015 DATED 06.05.2015 P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 08.06.2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT P8:

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 18.06.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J W.P.(C). NO. 20053 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ext. P6 order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal after all remits the matter to the first respondent for conducting a timing conference afresh. All the operators on the route shall be put on notice before allotting a time slot to them. Needless to say that Ext. P4 representation put in by the second respondent and Ext. P8 objection put in by the petitioner shall also be considered.

All the operators including the petitioner and the second respondent shall adhere to the time slot now allotted to them till a decision is taken afresh in the timing conference. The timing conference shall be held within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE