High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20058/2015disposed of

St Dominics Church ,Aluva v. The Transport Commissioner

2015-09-09Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/18TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20058 of 2015 (F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- ST DOMINIC'S CHURCH, (ARCH DIOCESE OF ERNAKULAM ), MARKET ROAD ALUVA 683101, REPRESENTED BY VICAR, JOHN THEKKAN BY ADV. SRI.JAISON JOSEPH RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER THIRUVNANTHAPURAM, PIN 695001

2. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, ALUVA PIN 683101 R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20058 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE VEHICLE DATA SHEET ISSUED BY THE DEALER P2:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE TEMPORARY REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE CHASSIS BEARING NO. KL 07 BQ -TEMP 1757 P3:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE FORM 22 (A) ISSUED BY THE BODY BUILDING WORKSHOP P4:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING NO. KL 41 J 2985 OF ST. MARY'S FORANE CHURCH KANJOOR P5:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 P6:

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 26.06.2015 P7:

THE TRUE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE VEHICLE P8:

THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT P9:

THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF NOTIFICATION AS HEARSE CATEGORY RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS::-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 20058 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines its relief to an early consideration of Ext. P5 representation. The same is for registration of the vehicle under the category - Hearse. 2.

The parties are at variance as to whether the vehicle could be registered in such category. Any way it is a matter to be decided by the second respondent while considering Ext. P5 representation. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext. P5 representation with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE