Jasleel K. v. University Of Calicut

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20065 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

-------------------------- JASLEEL K. AGED 32 YEARS S/O. ASSAN KOYA P.K., HIJAS HOUSE, KONGANNUR P.O. ATHOLI VIA, KOZHIKODE-673 315.

BY ADVS.SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL SMT.P.USHAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM-673 635 REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR.

2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.

KOZHIKODE-673 635.

R BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC,CALICUTY UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20065 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY GENERAL HOSPITAL, KOZHIKODE ON 30.9.2009 TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E7/6129/12 DTD.3.6.2015 OF THE DIRECTORATE OF VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE REQUEST DTD.15.6.2015 MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.

EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE NOTE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.18.6.2015 TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE REQUEST LETTER DTD.19.6.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT,P6 : COPY OF THE REQUEST LETTER DTD.18.6.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR OF VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL --------------------------------------- TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 20065 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner had sought for being relieved from the University, wherein he was working as an Assistant, to join an employment as Lecturer. The petitioner was initially granted a relieving order without retaining a lien, in the post he held in the University. The petitioner was before this Court seeking grant of lien. While so, the University made a submission before this Court that there are some adverse entries made in the service book of the petitioner. The petitioner is said to have made enquiries and received Ext.P4 Note wherein the then Vice-Chancellor had made some adverse comments. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submits on instruction that Ext.P4 is only an internal note and what is stated therein would not find a place in the service book. On the categoric undertaking of the University and on the admitted fact that the petitioner was

WPC.No.20065/2015 : 2 :

subsequently granted lien in the post in the University, as per the interim order issued by this Court, the writ petition would stand closed recording the undertaking.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge