Anwar K.M v. District Police Chief
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/29TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22731 of 2013 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
--------------- ANWAR K.M., AGED 35 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMADALI, KANJIRAMPLACKAL HOUSE, MAYANNUR.P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT-679 105.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENTS :
-------------------
1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, THRISSUR.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR.
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAZHAYANNUR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR.
4. THE SECRETARY INTUC, CHIRANGARA CENTRE UNIT, MAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
5. THE SECRETARY CITU, CHIRANGARA CENTRE UNIT, MAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.C.R. SYAM KUMAR. R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP (SR.) SRI.S.MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 22731 of 2013 (N) -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
------------------------------ EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF LICENSE DATED 12.8.13.
EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION UNDER THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX RULES DATED 28.6.08.
EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 3.9.13 MADE TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------ NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 22731 OF 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
Shaffique, J.
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to give adequate police protection to the petitioner, his workers and vehicles in the matter relating to conduct of business under the name and style 'K.M. Stores'.
2. It is alleged that respondents 4 and 5 and their men are obstructing the loading and unloading work done in the business premises by his own workers. It is mentioned that during the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner had already made arrangements for getting registration of his permanent employees.
3. Learned counsel for private respondents submits that already an agreement has been entered into with the respective Unions and their members with regard to the loading and unloading work in the business premises of petitioner. We record the above submission.
WP(C) No. 22731 of 2013 -:2:-
4. In the said circumstances we do not think that any further directions are required to be passed in this case. However, we make it clear that if any further cause of action arises, it shall be open for the petitioner to approach this Court. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Ashok Bhushan, Chief Justice.
A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
ttb/21/10