← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20144/2015disposed of

Sudheer S v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-07-034 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2015/12TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20144 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SUDHEER S., KILIYANVILAKOM, VAKKAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT:

---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (RURAL) ATTINGAL-695101.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 20144 of 2015 (P) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT. EXT.P2:

THE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 08/05/2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.13497 OF 2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) No.20144 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the non-issue of temporary permit to the petitioner, he has come up before this Court.

2. The petition is the owner of stage carriage bearing Reg. No.KL 16/8199. He had applied for temporary permit on the route between Kadakkavoor and Perumkuzhy in the vacancy of stage carriage bearing No.KL-16/D 5499. The petitioner alleges that the original bus is not operating and on account of the same, there is a temporary need under Section 87(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act warranting issuance of temporary permit.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. When the matter came up, the learned counsel for the petitioner confined his argument to the limited prayer for considering

WP(C)20144/15 -:2:- Ext.P1 application by the respondent in the light of Ext.P2 judgment of this Court.

Considering the nature of the submission, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioner in the light of Ext.P2 judgment within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj