Dr. Sajaya Kumar V. v. Kerala Dental Council
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/15TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 23940 of 2012 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- DR. SAJAYA KUMAR V, STAR DENTAL CARE, ARATTUVAZHI, ALAPPUZHA-688 007.
BY ADVS.SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SMT.RESMI G. NAIR RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. KERALA DENTAL COUNCIL, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 035 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
2. INDIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, KERALA STATE BRANCH, SR SUPER SPECIALITY DENTAL CLINIC AND IMPLANT CENTRE, MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM - 691 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. DR.SUJAI MATHAI, KARUNYA MULTI- SPECIALITY DENTAL CLINIC, NEAR ALLAHABAD BANK, VENICE SQUARE, THIRUVAMPADY, ALAPPUZHA-688 009.
R1 BY SRI.N.RAGHURAJ, SC R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.N.ARUN BECHU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 23940 of 2012 (N) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:
TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 1/7/2012 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2:
TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 6/7/2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT FORWARDING EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21/7/2012 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17/9/2012 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER ALONGWITH THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON 24/8/2012.
EXHIBIT P5:
TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 6/10/2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
- NIL -------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23940 of 2012 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Heard both sides.
2.
It was submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent that the Council has imposed a punishment upon the petitioner; and the same has been set aside by the Government, which is pending consideration in a fresh writ petition.
Therefore, leaving all questions open to be decided in appropriate proceedings, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE bka/-